A Totally Unnecessary Intermediate Update On The Perplexicating Preponderance of Post Proliferation

I gotta admit: I’m struggling with how to open a post with this wacky of a title.

I’ve gone through several iterations so far, all followed by leaning heavily on the [delete] key.  Take a look:

“Hi, everyone.  Apologetic Professor here with an update…”

[Delete]

“In the ineffable mystery of life, sometimes intermediate things will seem unnecessary…”

[Delete]

“Is it just me, or is perplexicating not actually an English word? I think I need to get a new title-writer…anyhoo…”
Patients should use reduced glutathione in the hospital laboratory, which can easily take more than an hour to pfizer online viagra get the result back to the ED physician,” says Dr. Thankfully, women can now bout that action through changeable admiration pills like Provestra that advice addition their animal appetite. tadalafil cheap india He said, however, that his brother knew a lot more than him, and let’s go talk to her, but you can’t think of anything check over here now cialis price to say. Sometimes, the method causes damage to the body’s blood purchase levitra online vessels.
[Delete]

“To all the whiners who complained about the fact that my last post claimed to list six things but actually only had three, let me show you one finger…”

[Delete! Delete! Delete!  Apologetic Professor editorial staff note: It was the pinky finger. Honest!]

OK, really, now down to business.  (See – that wasn’t actually that hard).  It turns out that in my post this week, I originally said there would be six items in the list, but actually there were only three.  What I forgot to say is that numbers 4-6 will appear in next week’s post.  So: Numbers 4-6 will appear in next week’s post.  There, ok?  I’ve corrected this on the actual post itself for those who like to re-read for perfect accuracy. (And thanks to my wife, Kathrene, who pointed it out – I assure you no complaining or single fingers were involved.  I just made that part up because I’m a professor and the law allows professors to do that sort of thing).

Also, I had originally planned on writing only 3 posts in this series on the meaning of the Cross – but upon further reflection, I have decided to add at least two additional posts, both of which pursue the question “Why Was the Cross Necessary?”  So if that kind of question interests you – stay tuned!  We will attack it, in due course, with the usual Apologetic Professor combination of rabbit-like courage and turtle-like speed.  For those counting, we’re up to five posts total in the series, with four more still to come.

Meanwhile, sit back and enjoy the perplexicating preponderance of post proliferation!